We will get an introduction to conditional statements in this lesson. We will write and analyze the truth of conditional and biconditional statements to help draw logical conclusions. With that information, we will learn about other ways to relate, combine, and change conjectures.
To describe how one event can lead to another, we can use conditional statements to connect a hypothesis to a conclusion.
A conditional statement itself has a truth value:
p \text{ (hypothesis)} | q \text{ (conclusion)} | p \to q |
---|---|---|
True | True | True |
True | False | False |
False | True | True |
False | False | True |
In a situation where we have the hypothesis leading to a conclusion and the conclusion leading back to the hypothesis, we can form a biconditional statement.
A biconditional statement is equivalent to a conditional statement p \to q and its converse q \to p simultaneously. Symbolically, we represent this biconditional statement asp \longleftrightarrow q
If a biconditional statement is true, then we can write it as a definition.
Consider the conditional statement "If a person is French, then they are European."
State the hypothesis and conclusion of the statement.
Determine the truth value of the conditional statement.
Consider the biconditional statement "An animal is a bird if and only if it can fly."
State the two conditional statements that this biconditional statement represents.
Determine whether the biconditional statement is true or false. If it is false, give a counterexample.
Determine whether each of the following is a valid definition or not:
"A midpoint is a point that cuts a line segment into two congruent segments."
"If an angle is acute, then its measure is less than 90\degree."
"A triangle is a polygon with three sides."
Recall the forms of conditional and biconditional statements:
Consider the following ways to relate, combine, and change conjectures that may change the truth value of statements:
Consider the following statement and its negation:
Statement \left(P\right): Birds eat elephants.
Negation (Not P): Birds do not eat elephants.
Symbolic: \sim P
Consider the following conditional statement and its inverse:
Statement (If P then Q): If an animal is a dog, then it has four legs.
Inverse (If not P then not Q): If an animal is not a dog, then it does not have four legs.
Symbolic: If \sim P then \sim Q
Consider the following conditional statement and its converse:
Statement (If P then Q): If an animal is a dog, then it has four legs.
Converse (If Q then P): If an animal has four legs, then it is a dog.
Symbolic: If Q then P
The contrapositive of the statement "If an animal is a dog, then it has four legs" is "If an animal does not have four legs, then it is not a dog." Note that a contrapositive statement is logically equivalent to the original conditional statement.
Consider the following conditional statement and its contrapositive:
Statement (If P then Q): If an animal is a dog, then it has four legs.
Contrapositive (If not Q then not P): If an animal does not have four legs, then it is not a dog.
Symbolic: If \sim Q then \sim P
Consider the conditional statements.
"If a number ends in zero, then it is divisible by ten."
State the contrapositive of the statement.
"If C then D."
Where C and D are both conjectures.
State the converse of the statement.
"If B then D."
B and D are both conjectures.
State the inverse of the statement.
Derived logical statements: