Tawana says that the congruence theorem: Side-Side-Angle (SSA) is a valid congruence theorem and works for all triangles.
Explain why SSA is not valid by providing a counterexample for Tawana's claim.
Tawana changes her claim and states that SSA is valid for right triangles. Explain why this statement made by Tawana is valid.
In general, side-side-angle is not a valid congruence theorem. When the congruent angle pair are right angles, however, we introduce a new triangle congruence theorem specific to right triangles:
Remember, the hypotenuse is the side opposite the right angle.
Prove the HL congruency theorem using rigid transformations with the given diagram.
Given:
Prove: \triangle{ILK}\cong \triangle{JLK}
Consider the triangles shown below:
Identify the additional information needed to prove these triangles congruent by HL congruence.
What other information could be given about the triangles to be able to prove congruence?
Find the value for each of the variables that makes \triangle{ABC} \cong \triangle{CDE}.
Construct a triangle congruent to \triangle ABC using one leg and hypotenuse.
To show that two right triangles are congruent, it is sufficient to demonstrate Hypotenuse-leg, (or HL): If the hypotenuse and leg of one right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and leg of another right triangle, then the two triangles are congruent