Depreciation is the term used for the loss of value of an item over time. The loss of value is often due to the fact that the item has been used regularly and some of its utility has been lost. Cars, for example, tend to wear out with use and do not run as well or look as good as they did when new. Also, an item can depreciate in value because fashions change and older things sometimes become less desirable.
If the amount of depreciation is a fixed amount per period, or a fixed percentage of the initial value, it is called flat rate depreciation. If the amount of depreciation is based on the unit output of the asset, such as kilometres travelled for a car, it is called unit cost depreciation. In each case, the rate of depreciation remains the same across the life of the asset, and so the asset's value shows linear decay over time, hence, this type of depreciation is often referred to as straight line depreciation.
Flat rate and unit cost depreciation can be modelled using the following recurrence relation:V_{n+1}=V_n-d, \, V_0=aWhere V_{n+1} is the value of the asset after n+1 time periods, d is the amount of depreciation per time period, and a is the initial value of the asset.
The graph shows the depreciation of a car's value over 4 years.
What is the initial value of the car?
By how much did the car depreciate each year?
After how many years will the car be worth \$14\,400?
What is the value of the car after 4 years ?
Flat rate and unit cost depreciation can be modelled using the following recurrence relation:
Whereas flat rate and unit cost have a constant amount of depreciation per time period, a reducing balance depreciation has a constant depreciation ratio or percentage. For example, an asset may depreciate at a constant rate of 10\% per year. If a graph of this is plotted, it will be non-linear.
We can use the following recurrence relation:V_{n+1}=RV_n, \, V_0=aWhere V_{n+1} is the value of the asset after n+1 time periods, R is the remaining proportion of the asset after each time period (usually expressed as a decimal), and a is the initial value of the asset.
Unlike flat rate and unit cost, reducing balance depreciation is an example of a geometric decay.
It is helpful to compare the graphs of flat rate and unit cost depreciation with that of reducing balance depreciation to see the differences.
Consider an example with an initial investment of \$1000. Below, the first graph with the blue dots represent a constant drop in value of \$100 each year. The second graph with the green dots represent a drop in value of 10\% each year.
As the graphs show, a constant or flat rate of depreciation ends up being modelled by a linear function or an arithmetic sequence. A percentage rate of depreciation is best modelled by an exponential function or a geometric sequence.
We can use the sequence facility of our CAS calculator to analyse situations involving depreciation. Identify the type of depreciation involved and create a table of values or graph to display the value over time.
After one year, the value of a company’s machinery had decreased by \$16\,020 from \$89000. The value of the machinery depreciates by a constant percentage each year.
At what rate did the machinery depreciate in the first year?
What will the machinery be worth at the end of the second year?
Write a recurrence relation, V_{n+1}, that gives the value of the machinery at the end of year n.
The company bought this machinery at the end of 2011. When the value of the machinery falls below \$3000. they will invest in new machinery. In which year will this occur?
In reducing balance depreciation, we can use the following recurrence relation: