topic badge
India
Class XI

Inductive Proofs for Inequalities

Lesson

We demonstrate a few interesting examples of induction relating to inequalities.

Example 1

To prove that $3^n\ge1+2n$3n1+2n for $n\ge1$n1

Testing for $n=1$n=1 and $n=2$n=2, we find $3\ge3$33 and $9\ge7$97 consecutively, and so it is true for the first two cases.

We now assume that its true for $n=k$n=k (where $k$k is a positive integer) so that $3^k\ge1+2k$3k1+2k. Then we attempt to prove, using that assumption, that $3^{k+1}\ge1+2(k+1)$3k+11+2(k+1). In other words we will attempt to prove that $3^{k+1}\ge3+2k$3k+13+2k

Often with the inequality types of induction, its more convenient to build a proof by starting from the assumption itself.

So starting from $3^k\ge1+2k$3k1+2k we write:

$3^k$3k $\ge$ $1+2k$1+2k
$3\times3^k$3×3k $\ge$ $3+6k$3+6k
$3^{k+1}$3k+1 $\ge$ $(3+2k)+4k$(3+2k)+4k
$\therefore3^{k+1}$3k+1 $\ge$ $(3+2k)$(3+2k)
     

Note in the second last line that we simply dropped the positive term $4k$4k, because if $3^{k+1}$3k+1 is greater than or equal to $(3+2k)+4k$(3+2k)+4k then it certainly must be greater than the smaller quantity $(3+2k)$(3+2k)

So if it is true for $n=k$n=k then it is also true for $n=k+1$n=k+1. We know by direct substitution that it is true for $n=1$n=1 and $n=2$n=2, so in turn it must also true for $n=3$n=3, and in turn for $n=4$n=4, and $n=5$n=5 etc. In other words it is true for all $n$n.

 

Example 2

Prove by induction that $(1+x)^n\ge1+nx$(1+x)n1+nx where $x>-1$x>1 and $n$n is a positive integer.

The restriction $x>-1$x>1 is explained by considering the left hand side of the inequality.

The inequality is obviously true if $x$x was allowed to be zero, with $1^n\ge1$1n1. For $x<-1$x<1 however $(1+x)^n$(1+x)n becomes negative for odd values of $n$n, and this can lead to a problem with the inequality. For example with $x=-3$x=3 and $n=5$n=5, the inequality reads $(1-3)^5\ge1+(-15)$(13)51+(15) or when evaluated, $-32\ge-14$3214. This simple example demonstrates that it is not always true when $x<-1$x<1.   

Continuing with the proof, for $n=1$n=1, we have $(1+x)^1=1+x$(1+x)1=1+x which is clearly true. For $n=2$n=2, we have $(1+x)^2=1+2x+x^2$(1+x)2=1+2x+x2 which, because $x^2$x2 is a non-negative term, is again greater than or equal to $1+2x$1+2x.

So it is definitely true for $n=1$n=1 and $n=2$n=2

Assume that its true for $n=k$n=k, so that $(1+x)^k\ge1+kx$(1+x)k1+kx 

The task then is to prove the statement for $n=k+1$n=k+1, namely that $(1+x)^{k+1}\ge1+(k+1)x$(1+x)k+11+(k+1)x.

Taking the left hand side we have:

LHS $=$= $(1+x)^{k+1}$(1+x)k+1
  $=$= $(1+x)^k(1+x)$(1+x)k(1+x)
  $\ge$ $(1+kx)(1+x)$(1+kx)(1+x)
  $\ge$ $1+x+kx+kx^2$1+x+kx+kx2
  $\ge$ $1+(k+1)x+kx^2$1+(k+1)x+kx2
  $\ge$ $1+(k+1)x$1+(k+1)x

The assumption that $(1+x)^k\ge1+kx$(1+x)k1+kx was inserted in line 3, and so it is true for $n=k+1$n=k+1 provided we accept thais assumption. But it is true for $n=2$n=2, so it must also be true for $n=3$n=3, and in turn for $n=4$n=4, etc. Hence it is true for all positive integers $n$n

Example 3

Prove that $4^{n-1}>n^2$4n1>n2 for integer $n$n where $n\ge3$n3

For $n=1$n=1 and $n=2$n=2 the inequality doesn't work, and this explains the restriction on $n$n.

For $n=3$n=3, we have $4^2>3^2$42>32 which is clearly true.

So we assume it's true for $n=k$n=k, specifically that $4^{k-1}>k^2$4k1>k2, and attempt to prove it for $n=k+1$n=k+1.

That is, we need to prove that, for $k\ge3$k3,  $4^k>(k+1)^2$4k>(k+1)2

The proof involves a few mathematical "tricks" that we will explain as we go.

Firstly:

$4^k$4k $=$= $4^{k-1+1}$4k1+1
  $=$= $4^{k-1}\times4^1$4k1×41
  $=$= $4^{k-1}\times4$4k1×4
     

What this slight rearrangement does is to cleverly allow the assumption into the argument. Since $4^{k-1}>k^2$4k1>k2, then we can write:

$\therefore4^k$4k $>$> $k^2\times4$k2×4
     

The right hand side becomes four lots of $k^2$k2, so we will strategically split these up, so that:

$4^k$4k $>$> $k^2+2k^2+k^2$k2+2k2+k2
     

Note that, certainly for $k\ge3$k3, $2k^2$2k2 (the second term on the right hand side) is greater than $2k$2k and $k^2$k2 (the third term) is greater than $1$1. So if we replace $2k^2$2k2 with $2k$2k and $k^2$k2 with $1$1, the right hand side reduces in size, so it must follow that:

$4^k$4k $>$> $k^2+2k+1$k2+2k+1
$\therefore4^k$4k $>$> $(k+1)^2$(k+1)2
     

Hence it is true for $n=k+1$n=k+1, and the rest of the proof follows easily.

The second strategy involving the replacement of $2k^2$2k2 and $k^2$k2 with $2k$2k and $1$1 respectively was strategic because it opened up a pathway directly into the statement we needed. Imagine the thinking of the person who first proved this.    

 

 

 

Outcomes

11.A.PMI.1

Processes of the proof by induction, motivating the application of the method by looking at natural numbers as the least inductive subset of real numbers. The principle of mathematical induction and simple applications.

What is Mathspace

About Mathspace